Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Tentative answer: What is the place for reason in search of the truth for Al-Ghazali ? (for David S)


In Al-Ghazali's, The Rescuer From Error, the author embarks on a lifelong journey searching through all known sciences and disciplines in an attempt to discern what can be known with absolute certainty. ‘"Since I seek to know things as they really are, I must first seek out the reality of knowledge itself.’ It became apparent that certain knowledge is that in which what is known is laid bare in such a way as to leave no room for doubt, and is unaccompanied by the possibility of error or illusion, to the point that the mind cannot even conceive it. Rather, what is secure from error should be so closely associated with certainty, that if someone tried to show that it was false by turning stone into gold or a stick into a snake, for example, that would not make it doubtful or refute it" (61). 
            Al Ghazali sets forth an incredibly high standard for certainty of knowledge which is virtually impossible to attain. Al-Ghazali proclaims that if someone were to turn a stick into a serpent as proof that a statement is true, the Al Ghazali says "the only outcome would be wonderment at how he is able to perform such a feat" (61).  Al Ghazali would have no doubt that the statement was true and he concludes that "whatever I did not know in this manner and was not certain of in this way was untrustworthy and insecure knowledge; and every knowledge that is insecure is not certain knowledge" (61).
Al Ghazali does not believe that certain or secure knowledge can be found through sensory perceptions. Al Ghazali notes that when he relies on his vision, his eyes tell him that a shadow is stationary yet he later observes that the shadow gradually moves. His visions tell him that celestial bodies are tiny yet geometric proofs indicate the celestial bodies are larger than the earth.  This indicates to Al Ghazali that his sensory perceptions cannot be relied upon for certain knowledge because his rational mind knows his visual perceptions have misled him. He states " My confidence in sensory beliefs has also been annulled. Perhaps one can only trust rational beliefs" (62).

 Next, Al Ghazali looks to reason and rational beliefs to attain knowledge that can be had with absolute certainty and again he is disappointed. Al Ghazali finds ‘"Negation and affirmation cannot coexist in the same thing. The same thing cannot be both originated and eternal, or existent and nonexistent, or necessary and impossible" (62). Just as his sensory perceptions were proven wrong by his rational mind, Al Ghazali's rational beliefs are now proven wrong by a judge who exists behind rational apprehension. His sensory beliefs say to him "you trusted in me, but the judge of reason disproved me. Were it not for the judge of reason, you would have continued to believe in me. Perhaps behind rational apprehension there is another judge who, if he were to manifest himself, would disprove the judgment of reason, just as the judge of reason manifested himself to disprove the judgments of sense perception. The fact that such an apprehension has not manifested itself does not indicate that it is impossible"(62).

Al Ghazali comes to mistrust his sensory perceptions because his rational beliefs showed him they were not always accurate. Now Al Ghazali mistrusts his rational mind and reason because it is possible that another judge might disprove his rational thoughts: "Why are you so sure that everything you believe in your waking state on the basis of the senses or reason is true in relation to your current state? ...  Perhaps the temporal life is slumber by comparison with the afterlife, and when you die things will appear differently to you from the way they appear now.  At that point, you will be told: 'We have removed your veil and your vision is now acute'. (Qur'an 50:22)"  (Al Ghazali p. 63) 


Al Ghazali rejects reason as a means to acquire certain knowledge because reason cannot comprehend the absolute and the infinite. Reason can only explain the finite and observe relative relationships.  Absolute truth and certain knowledge must be able to consider the infinite.

No comments:

Post a Comment